Link: http://powerofaith.com

Very shortly after the vice presidential debate was over, between Joe Biden and Sarah Palin, MSNBC reported on their website: "The stakes were much higher and the bar was much lower for Palin. So, in the contest of low expectations, Palin won." (very flattering)

What can I say? This news organization "is" new to journalism and hasn't quite got the hang of the "Fair and Ballanced" aspect of it yet.

Link: http://powerofaith.com

Wow! Now there's a mean looking picture of John McCain. This picture was taken from one of the many flyers (propagana advertisements) that my wife (being a woman and all) receives in the mail, from the Michigan Democratic State Central Committee. The header reads: "John McCain is running on the republican platform, which would ban all abortions - even in cases of rape and incest".

Then in small print, they give a list of sources from which they got this information. The sources of course are all "liberal, biased organizations" (ABC News, Chicago Tribune, Eric Zorn)

A secondary caption also reads: "McCain received a 0% rating from Planned Parenthood". Actually, I can't believe they're broadcasting that! It is actually a feather in McCain's cap. After all, if you remember on the news recently, it was Planned Parenthood that eagerly accepted a mans donation, under the condition that the money only go toward aborting "Black Babies", as this man wanted to contribute to eliminating the black race. (remember?)

Speaking of a womans right to choose, who does one contact to stop receiving these lies and propaganda, being delivered to our house in the mail? We choose to Opt Out! (oh well, so much for her rights) To set the record strait, McCain never at any time said or endorsed abortion for women in cases of rape and incest.

I have sort of a rule of thumb. If a group or party feels that they can only get their candidate elected, by constantly lying about their opponent, their candidate doesn't have enough going for him to deserve our vote.

Remember in November!

Link: http://powerofaith.com

When Sarah Palin said: "The difference between a Hockey Mom and a Pit Bull - LipStick". The democratic party should have taken her more to heart.

Have you noticed, that every time these left wing Gomers go running in to attack her, (or McCain for that matter) they come limping back! (They go running in - they come limping out) haha~

The recent attack from Mr Obama, his accidentally on purpose comment: "You can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig", not only brought the republican party to her defense, but many of the undecided Hillary voters.

What do you say to someone who charges at a pit bull? Duh? I guess when you start to get desperate, you start to act irrationally. The really insane part is, they haven't caught on yet, that every time they attack this woman, their ratings go down and her's go up!

Link: http://powerofaith.com

"You can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig". That's the old saying - right?

But then, in this case, it's not just an old saying, it's more of an act of desperation! Is it simply a coincidence that Barack Obama coined this old phrase, only a week after Sarah Palin said: "How do you tell a hockey mom from a Pit Bull . . . "Lipstick!"

If you watched the video, (above) you'll notice that Obama's liberal democratic audience knew for a fact, that he was slamming Sarah Palin, either that, or they were just so bored with him, that they all found relief in laughing so hard at an "old" saying. Which do "you" think it was?

Is this low class statement, an act of desperation, by a bitter candidate who is watching his favorability in the poles evaporate quickly, or was he simply, innocently, coining and old phrase? That's for you to decide.

Link: http://powerofaith.com

Sarah Palin's speech attracted more television viewers, than did Barack Obama's so called "historic speech"

Since John McCain introduced this woman less than a week ago, she has been under fierce attack by the media and democratic party. One news flash that I read just today was:

When Will Palin Give Interview?
John McCain Offers One Answer, Campaign Manager Gives Another
Brian Snyder, Reuters

Of course this was meant to cast her in a bad light, as though she's dodging the media. I however, had to laugh. I thought to myself: "Lord! Give this woman time to put on some lipstick, she's only been running less than a week! (duh)

In less than 1 week, 30 lawyers have been dispatched to Alaska, from the Obama campaign to try and dig up some dirt on this woman. I guess it never occured to anyone, that if you have to dig "that" hard to find something, it's probably "not" newsworthy anyway.

Wouldn't it be fun to take each one of these 30 lawyers, and put them under the same scrutiny? I'd be willing to bet that for each one of them, the difference in dirt between them and Sarah Palin, would be comparable to a "wheel barrel compared to a teaspoon".

If you want to know what a person will be like as president, just watch how they run their campaign! (30 lawyers?) Isn't this exactly what needs to be changed within our broken justice system? (This is from the candidate of change?)

The humorous part is the fact that they didn't even wait to find any dirt, they started "Sexist" attacks on her right away. So , think about it. They don't even know this woman, but start attacking her immediately. This tells me that it wouldn't have mattered who she was, they still, would have attacked her. It could have been Mother Theresa and it wouldn't have mattered. (This speaks volumes about this particular campaign, doesn't it?)

One of the first questions asked of Sarah Palin was: "How can you be vice president and raise 5 children?" Her reply was: "The same way every other Governor in the United States does it". It was a "very" sexist question.

I raised 3 children on my own. When I wasn't working, I was looking for work. During that time, I did everything that a mother and father "both" were expected to do. (Homework, PTA, cooking, cleaning - fill in the blanks etc...)

No one asked me how I was going to hold down a job and raise 3 children. Guess what? Nobody cared! So far, Sarah Palin has been a breath of fresh air. She's genuine, "real people", and that is attractive to most of us Americans. Real people like real people. Not the phoney, political B.S. that always goes on.

The liberal democratic parties "true colors" are finally being brought out into the light, for everyone to see. The same party that has bragged for decades, that they stand up for equality and women's rights, are the very ones that are being sexist. And their brand of "equality" stops at the point where you disagree with their political views.

Sarah Palin is smart, she's capable and seems to be just what the doctor ordered. Not to mention, she's done a great job as a Governor. It is wonderful, yet sad at the same time, that:

"The best man for the job, happens to be a woman"